Can Tiny Galaxies Explain Dark Matter?

Mysterious globular clusters may yield clues to even-more mysterious dark matter

  • Share
  • Read Later
Getty Images

If you could step back a few quadrillion miles and look at the Milky Way from the outside, you’d see a magnificent, glowing pinwheel of stars and gas, its arms curving majestically outward from a huge, bright, central knot. If you looked closer, you’d see much tinier clumps—roughly spherical, with a million stars at most compared with the Milky Way’s hundreds of billions—buzzing around our galaxy’s core like bees circling the hive. Astronomers call them globular clusters and know that they contain the oldest stars in the Milky Way. But how they came to exist, and what role they might have played in the Milky Way’s 13-billion-year-history is still a mystery.

If the globular clusters around our own galaxy are still a puzzle, however, those elsewhere might help answer some other stubborn questions, thanks to a new discovery made with the Hubble Space Telescope. By pointing the Hubble at a giant collection of galaxies known as Abell 1689, some 2 billion light-years away, observers found evidence of an astonishing 160,000 globular clusters. If the 160 or so globular clusters surrounding the Milky Way are like bees around a hive, the clusters in Abell 1689 are like a huge swarm massing around dozens of enormous hives. And by looking at precisely where they swarm, astronomers can calculate how dark matter is spread throughout the group of galaxies—and ultimately, what that matter, which constitutes most of the mass in the universe, is really made of.

(MORE: There’s No Up or Down in Space? Not So Fast)

The reasoning is utterly simple: stars form out of clouds of gas and dust, and you tend to get more stars where the clouds are densest. According to the conventional cosmic wisdom, gas wafting around the universe shortly after the Big Bang got sucked in by knots of dark matter, eventually becoming dense enough to burst into thermonuclear fire. If you look at the oldest living stars, you should be looking at where the dark-matter knots were—and still are—located.

In the Hubble study, the concentration of globular clusters rises sharply at the very center of the galaxy group, suggesting that the dark matter isn’t spread evenly through the group but rather at its core. That conclusion matches what astronomers have found in an entirely different way: earlier studies have shown that the galaxy group’s overall gravity acts as a giant cosmic lens, distorting the images of more distant galaxies. And that pattern of distortion too suggests a lump of dark-matter in the galaxy group’s central region.

Such mass distribution lends credence to the leading theory of dark matter: it’s some sort of still-undiscovered elementary particle, created in such huge amounts during the Big Bang that it outweighs ordinary matter by a factor of six or more. If that’s really what it is, the particles should cluster in more or less the way the new studies suggest. Other observations are less definitive, though, so scientists would prefer to find the particles directly, perhaps with the Large Hadron Collider, which recently scored a coup by finding the Higgs boson.

(MORE: More Proof That Getting Clobbered By Comets Led to Life)

But none of this helps explain where the globular clusters came from in the first place. They may be the lingering representatives of the very first, tiny galaxies in the universe, most of which merged to form today’s full-sized galaxies, like the Milky Way.

Or maybe not: there’s a reasonable chance that astronomers will truly understand the invisible dark matter before they figure out what the story is with globular clusters so bright they can be seen from halfway across the universe.

(PHOTOS: Voyager 1: Snapshots From the Journey)

2 comments
youtag.design
youtag.design

what if there's no such thing as dark matter?

as hard as we tried to prove its existence for decencies, it could not be found.

time to let go ghosts from the past and accept new theories.


what if the clusters in Abell 1689 only APPEAR like a huge swarm, due to their relative distance and time-space distortion?


ReidBarnes
ReidBarnes

This article says: "[D]ark matter: it’s some sort of still-undiscovered elementary particle, created in such huge amounts during the Big Bang … . If that’s really what it is, the particles should cluster in more or less the way the new studies suggest. Other observations are less definitive, though, so scientists would prefer to find the particles directly, perhaps with the Large Hadron Collider, which recently scored a coup by finding the Higgs boson."  REALLY? They found the Higgs boson?  Stephen Hawking said that he lost 100 dollars betting the Higgs boson wouldn't be found. If he paid already, he may have lost the 100 dollars, but he hasn't lost the bet yet.  We have to wait until 2015. According to CERN Research Director, Sergio Bertolucci, "Only when we know that it has spin-zero will we be able to call it a Higgs."  On top of that, scientist, Raymond "Volkas says that physicists and Higgs-watchers may have to prepare themselves for the possibility that the LHC data never establishes whether or not the particle is the Higgs predicted by the standard model," New Scientist reported.  2015 will be 48 years from the time a paper was published, and three physicists received the Nobel prize for the first edition of "The Standard Model" of subatomic physics with the "Higgs mechanism."  But they had all given up and gone to other pursuits after the 1967 paper that eventually sparked the award. Why?  Something has been holding back the hunt for the Higgs. The physics of "The Standard Model" is based on self-contradicting non-Euclidean geometry.  https://www.facebook.com/notes/reid-barnes/has-something-been-holding-back-the-search-for-the-higgs-boson/430347917017788