Critters So Ugly They Have to Mate With Themselves

Immaculate conception may be something special among humans, but in the animal kingdom, it's always been part of the mix

  • Share
  • Read Later
9 comments
troppls
troppls

Nature is not pretty, not ugly, just plain nature.


zelskid1
zelskid1

Gives new meaning to go %%ck yourself

BabuG.Ranganathan
BabuG.Ranganathan

NOT MADE BY NATURE! Just because something exists in nature doesn't mean it was invented or made by Nature. If all the chemicals necessary to make a cell were left to themselves, "Mother Nature" would have no ability to organize them into a cell. It takes an already existing cell to bring about another cell. The cell exists and reproduces in nature but Nature didn't invent or design it! Nature didn't originate the cell or any form of life.

Natural laws can explain how an airplane or living cell works, but it's irrational to believe that mere undirected natural laws can bring about an airplane or a cell. Once you have a complete and living cell then the genetic program and biological machinery exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how could the cell have originated naturally when no directing code and mechanisms existed in nature? All of the founders of modern science believed in God. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM

Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from sea sponge to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Survival of the fittest would actually have prevented evolution across kinds! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! (2nd Edition). I discuss: Punctuated Equilibria, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.

Natural selection doesn't produce biological traits or variations. It can only "select" from biological variations that are possible and which have survival value. The real issue is what biological variations are possible, not natural selection. Only limited evolution, variations of already existing genes and traits are possible. Nature is mindless and has no ability to design and program entirely new genes for entirely new traits.

What about genetic and biological similarities between species? Genetic information, like other forms of information, cannot happen by chance, so it is more logical to believe that genetic and biological similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These "non-coding" segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression (i.e. when, where, and how genes are expressed). Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM

Read my popular Internet article, HOW DID MY DNA MAKE ME?

Visit my newest Internet site: THE SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION

Sincerely,
Babu G. Ranganathan*
(B.A. theology/biology)

Author of popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS

* I have had the privilege of being recognized in the 24th edition of Marquis "Who's Who In The East" for my writings on religion and science, and I have given successful lectures (with question and answer time afterwards) defending creation from science before evolutionist science faculty and students at various colleges and universities

theirmind
theirmind

Ugly? That's all you humans say.

ssss
ssss

@BabuG.Ranganathan There are too many regulations (way beyond our senses to conceive),just the fact that this "Universe" has existed for as long as it did ,and  guarantee you that the Sun will still rise from the East tomorrow! 

Everything around us can be understood through decoding their laws and mechanisms.

How can laws exist without Logic?

They live in a different cell all together.


GottlosUndFrei
GottlosUndFrei

@BabuG.Ranganathan Oh golly gee you have a B.A. in Biology from the University of Funkytown?


I suppose Oxford Biology Professor Richard Dawkins was wrong after all. Someone should give him a call!

ssss
ssss

@GottlosUndFrei @BabuG.Ranganathan Since when does the university you graduate from; entitles you to the Nobel?!


Another atheist like logic, like smart scientists are atheist, so should I! 

You neglect the fact that scientist occupy the least productive profession of all professions!

(99% of scientific journals are considered junk,within this lifetime or the next,with all due respect to their cause)

How do you value someone that does not earn his/her money?

Like the electrified Dawkins?! 

PierreRoget
PierreRoget

@GottlosUndFrei @BabuG.Ranganathan Dawkins is a joke. Atheists believe in "nothing" but believe "nothing" created something. Yes, we all "came out of one cell", or "there was a "big bang" and the house of cards just so happened to create earth with 70% of it consisting of water, and then all the planets fell into place and then there was a day and a night. How lucky, "nothing" is so brilliant.